Anti………………..VACCERS/BOOSTER/MASKERS/DISTANCERS/LOCKEMUPPERS…………..#@%)&$@#%#FuRu$@#$##%$&$#@&$#@%$&$##€~§\§#@&#@#%&@#%#@%&$*$@#—&#
BUT ROSEANN…
They illegally made the Covid 19 virus; was it released on purpose or by accident becomes irrelevant. They blocked the use of known pretreatments that would have saved the lives of millions. They made a deadly experimental mRNA injection that killed millions and millions of more will die or be sterlized. All for profit, power, reducing population, and to remove a sitting President….for either or, or all.
…….. “NEVER MIND”
.
.
NOV 2
🗞*WORLD NEWS AND COMMENTARY* 🗞
🔥 This next tweet is a perfect compliment to the following story about that Atlantic op-ed now taking the country by storm. Here’s what a nice lawyer said on Twitter Monday (I blurred her name since that’s not the point):
Now, I get that there are various possible takes on this, but to ME, this is a great start. This lawyer has long-since joined Team Reality, she’s not just now waking up, but her public act of contrition is helpful, not so much for her, as much as for the people who are most angry about what happened to them over the last two years.
I’m not asking you to agree with me. Just think about that while we talk about the next story.
🔥 Let’s start with ZeroHedge’s electrifying headline yesterday: “‘You Murderous Hypocrites’: Outrage Ensues After The Atlantic Suggests ‘Amnesty’ For Pandemic Authoritarians.”
The outrage erupted following publication of an Atlantic op-ed that ran on Monday with the headline, “Let’s Declare a Pandemic Amnesty,” and the sub-headline, “We need to forgive one another for what we did and said when we were in the dark about COVID.”
The well-written, lucid, and honest op-ed’s author was Professor Emily Oster, who championed masking and lockdowns early in the pandemic, often wielding “the science” as a weapon against anyone who questioned government orthodoxy. But to her credit, the mother of young children quickly came around to arguing for school re-opening, and later un-masking, and so, at various times, was criticized by both sides.
Oster began her plea for peace by giving readers a harrowing glimpse of what life inside an elite family looks like: when hiking outdoors, she taught her kids parental ‘hand signals,’ used whenever someone approached on the trail, to politely alert her kids to firmly fasten their useless cotton face masks.
Once, Oster recalled, when a little girl got “too close” to her then-4-year-old son on a bridge, the boy screamed “SOCIAL DISTANCING!”
Oster now admits her son was “totally misguided,” which is a fancy, blame-dodging, elitist synonym for “wrong.” And it takes almost no effort at all to calculate where the 4-year-old got his totally misguided idea from.
Oster frankly admitted that outdoor transmission was “vanishingly rare,” and that her family’s cloth masks (made out of old bandanas) wouldn’t have done anything, anyway. But, she explained, the thing was: THEY DIDN’T KNOW.
That seems to be Oster’s main point. In other words, during the fog of covid uncertainty, well-intentioned folks “on both sides” advocated for and against pandemic policies like masking, lockdowns, and so forth, sometimes hotly.
The professor explained that, in the fog of war, EVERYONE was guessing, and in hindsight, some people just got lucky with their guesses. “The people who got it right, for whatever reason, may want to gloat. Those who got it wrong, for whatever reason, may feel defensive,” she wrote. “In the face of so much uncertainty, getting something right had a hefty element of luck. And, similarly, getting something wrong wasn’t a moral failing.”
Then she reached her main argument, the one that put a lit match to social media’s leaky oil refinery: “We have to put these fights aside and declare a pandemic amnesty.”
Yikes.
The reactions from many members of Team Reality were, as ZeroHedge’s headline suggested, immediate and white-hot. Many of you guys have probably already noticed the controversy, if not already dipped into the outrage pool yourselves.
The reason for the outrage, I believe, wasn’t Oster’s call for amnesty, which after all, wasn’t really asking for forgiveness, it was more like for a temporary peace. Her sin, in my view, was that she failed to address the biggest difference between what she described as the two sides, the ‘right’ side and the ‘wrong’ side.
Emily: Our side, the right side, never tried to shut your side up. Our side never tried to cancel and delete you for advocating your ‘wrong’ side. Our side never punished you for disagreeing, like by getting you fired from your job or taking you off organ transplant lists.
Emily mistakenly believes that “disagreement over policy” generated the continuing conflict. She’s totally wrong about that, and it unfortunately cratered her attempted peace deal.
The mistake that we really need to wrestle with is not that Oster and her ilk were intellectually wrong about pandemic policy. We need to deal with the sins that people — including Oster — committed against their fellow citizens who disagreed with them. It’s odd that Oster missed this critical distinction, since she began her article with that painful confession about her 4-year-old “misguidedly” yelling at a little girl.
It was the YELLING, Emily. Not the difference of opinion.
Having said all that, I agree with Emily on one point. As I wrote a couple days before she published her inflammatory op-ed, we ARE going to have to figure out how to deal with the majority of people who were wrong about pandemic restrictions. I’m talking about the majority of people who complied with the government narrative but did not cheerlead for harming those who disagreed.
See the difference? We need accountability for people who championed PUNISHMENT for those of us who turned out to be right. But people who just yelled “social distancing,” or, like the lady whose tweet I reprinted above, scolded a guy in Costo about wearing his mask, most of those people are victims of a massive government psyop campaign, too.
Just different kinds of victims.
Both Emily Oster and the lady in the tweet are now struggling with their profound embarrassment over how they mistreated individual people during the pandemic. Oster wouldn’t have started her piece talking about ridiculous hand signals and her bossy son if she weren’t feeling badly about those things.
Both Oster and the lady in the tweet eventually came around and recognized that they were wrong. And Oster is right: we DO need amnesty with THOSE folks, so that we can assemble the majority that we need to bring accountability to the smaller group of unforgivable enablers and architects of the campaign to destroy all of us who were right to resist.
That includes not just the evil pharma clowns at the top like Fauci, Collins, Bourla, and Walensky, but extends right down to local doctors and poseur scientists who sold out to big pharma and mindlessly parroted whatever they were told to say, regardless of how irrational or destructive.
At the end of the day, I think the controversy over Oster’s op-ed is a good thing. People need to vent. It’s a global conversation we need to have. Just remember, we’re going to need A LOT of those folks. It’s good to recall that many of them are victims, too
.
Total bullshit! The elites, self -recognizing of their own superiority, are merely generously offering to forgive us for our baseless anger, which has so annoyed them. Imagine! We are, after all, inconveniencing them while they graciously try to help us in our egregious error.How deplorably gauche of us to so offend them.
Militant Populism is an attractive choice for we deplorables. Actual physical confrontation is an equally attractive and refreshing option.
This is not about a difference of opinion.
I DID MY HOMEWORK. My "opinion" was based on listening to and reading from EXPERTS, doctors, virologists, epidemiologists, and other scientists. There was NEVER any science to this masking nonsense, it was a sign of compliance and a way to keep the fear up, as I said back in spring 2020. There was NEVER any question about the science of a lockdown for healthy people, bullshit about "asymptomatic infection," social distancing, or the fiendish evil of masking little children and INFANTS, or horror of horrors, JABBING them, when they were virtually without ANY need for ANY of these "health measures."
This is still GENOCIDE, not a "pandemic." We're still talking about a planned, EVIL stunt to euthanize the vast majority of the world' human beings.
IF any of these "sorry now" people had simply DONE THEIR HOMEWORK, or at least been CIVIL to those of us who resisted an invasive medical and highly questionable procedure by MANDATE or lose your jobs, your families, your housing, everything...
FUCK Amnesty. Amnesty after REPARATIONS, maybe.
And it's not OVER. This will go on, and coming soon, financial fuckery and tech fuckery and nuclear threats and all the rest of the planned HELL and destruction...
Yeah, I'm a little pissed off, and I probably haven't had the worst time. It's gonna take a loooong time to get back to ANY kind of reasonable life/living, and the damage is ongoing and will be extensive. That's not to say We the Peeps can't rally up and do amazing things... That's what we do when we have to. We are resilient and amazing. We are HUMANITY, not a bunch of talking cows, and WE ROCK.
Don't mess with us if you don't want the results.