COVID NEWS AND COMMENTARY…..JEFF CHILDERS
💉 The British Medical Journal (BMJ) quietly published a remarkable paper last
month titled, “Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA Vaccination in Randomized Trials.”
The conclusion is shocking. Let’s parse out the researchers’ technically-worded statement:
> The excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest surpassed the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group in both Pfizer and Moderna trials (2.3 and 6.4 per 10,000 participants, respectively).
In other words, they’re saying the risk of having a serious vaccine injury is greater than the benefits of the covid vaccines.
Smartly, the researchers used the drugmakers’ own clinical trial data, so there’s no arguing about the dataset. It’s the same dataset the FDA relied on to grant EUA approval to the drugs. Everyone is on the same page. Combining the two trials, “there was a +43% increased risk of serious AESI and an absolute risk increase of +12.5 serious AESI per 10,000 vaccinated participants.”
Also, between both trials, the largest increase in absolute risk occurred in the category of COAGULATION DISORDERS. Clotting. Imagine that. And they found “more cardiovascular AESIs occurred in the vaccine group in the Pfizer trial.”
The study also gets into why the FDA’s original conclusions were different than theirs. It’s pretty technical, having to do with things like that the FDA only counted a patient having multiple types of injuries as only a single injury. But the researchers appear to criticize the FDA, noting “In July 2021, the FDA reported detecting four potential adverse events of interest: pulmonary embolism, acute myocardial infarction, immune thrombocytopenia, and disseminated intravascular coagulation following Pfizer’s vaccine based on medical claims data in older Americans.”
Then, they noted despite finding signals of high adverse events, nothing much has happened, not in a YEAR: “FDA stated it would further investigate the findings but at the time of our writing has not issued an update.” Weird.
The researchers also shored up their conclusion by observing their results were “compatible with a recent preprint analysis of COVID-19 vaccine trials by Benn et al., which found no evidence of a reduction in overall mortality in the mRNA vaccine trials based on data from the later, March 2021 BLA (Biologics License Application) timepoints that underpinned subsequent regulatory approval.”
Studies like this one, and the Benn preprint, may be what’s fueling the narrative pivot we appear to be seeing. They directly challenge the original conclusions the FDA regulators used to approve the drugs. We have no idea how many similar studies are in the pipeline, but journal editors do. And we know that government actors like Fauci and Collins talk to the journal editors; we’ve seen this kind of “cooperation” in the covid emails. We’ve also seen Fauci and Collins plotting media campaigns.
So it’s not a stretch to link what’s happening in journals to what we see happening in corporate media. If there is a connection, things will get very interesting, very fast.
———————————————————————
ALSO…….WE HAVE NO IDEA HOW MANY PEOPLE THIS HAS HAPPENED TO BECAUSE MOST YOUNGER PEOPLE PREFER CREMATION.
Board-certified funeral directors and embalmers are coming forward to tell tales of horror featuring vaccinated bodies with veins and arteries clogged with strange, rubbery, worm-like clots.
Richard Hirschman, a funeral director and embalmer from Alabama, with over twenty years of experience in the field, has said in recent interviews that he had never seen anything like it until around the middle of 2021, after the mass injections of the experimental COVID vaccines began. He says his colleagues in the field are seeing the same thing, and the numbers are increasing.
Earlier this month, Hirschman told Steve Kirsch, the Executive Director of the Vaccine Research Center, that in Jan 2022, 37 out of 57 bodies (65 percent) had these suspicious clots.
Prior to the vaccines, Hirschman said blood clots in patients who died of COVID were seen, but they appeared to be more typical, and not in the alarming numbers he’s seeing now.
Since Hirschman has gone public, Cary D. Watkins, a colleague from Alabama with over 50 years experience as a funeral director and embalmer, has come forward to corroborate his story, and Anna Foster, an embalmer from Missouri with 11 years of experience, has revealed in an interview that 93 percent of her last 30 cases died due to unusual clots completely filling their vascular systems.
Funeral director John O’Looney of Milton Keynes, England, is also blowing the whistle on the alarming increase in number of thrombosis deaths. O’Looney said in an interview that it’s not just “a two or three-fold increase—it’s around a 500 or 600 percent increase,” and nine out of ten of these cases were vaccinated.
“I’ve got doctors and police ringing me, nurses ringing me, all saying the same thing. It’s a total lie. On our media, they are saying the hospitals are full of the non-vaccinated. That’s a total fabrication. It’s the polar opposite. Nine out of ten patients in there, full of blood clots, are the vaccinated. I’ve heard that from so many professionals that I’ve lost count. So, whether you choose to believe it or not, it makes it no worse. That is the truth. That is the reality. You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make it drink,” O’Looney said in an interview late last month.
Hirschman told the Blaze’s Daniel Horowitz on his Conservative Review podcast Wednesday, that he was hesitant to come forward because any information that questions the government’s pro-vaccine narrative gets mocked and ridiculed, and his reputation could suffer.
But as Kirsch pointed out, there is no other explanation for what is happening.
“It pretty much has to be a novel injectable product, first used in 2021 that results in blood clots and is injected into well over 50 percent of the population. There is only one drug that fits that bill: the COVID vaccines,” he wrote on his Substack.
Since the vast majority of people survive the shots, the question of whether a vaccinated person dies or not is likely a combination of how well they “take up and replicate the mRNA, how dangerous the batch is, and other factors,” Kirsch wrote.
He explained why Hirschman’s information is “explosive.”
So let’s say the actual rate of vaccine-caused deaths is 40 percent of all deaths (which is less than the 65 percent rate that Hirschman is seeing).
The CDC says around 65,000 people die a week. So that would be 26,000 people a week killed by the vaccine. He started noticing these deaths in May (they could have started sooner), so let’s just say it’s only been in the last 6 months to be conservative.
26 weeks *26,000 deaths/week=676,000 vaccine-related deaths.
Hirschman told Horowitz that he’s discussed the phenomenon with 15 of his colleagues, and every one of them has seen same things he has, but they are afraid to speak out publicly.
Hirschman, who was first interviewed by Dr. Jane Ruby in late January, shared photos and videos of the strange fibrous clots that were extracted from people who reportedly died of heart attacks, strokes, and aneurysms.
In many cases, Hirschman says, the freakishly long clots start out looking fairly typical on one end, and then become white and fibrous and wormlike. The specimen below, which bifurcates toward the end, was allegedly taken from a person’s groin area, and was nearly the length of their leg.
Hirschman washed off the white, fibrous portions of the clots from one person, and put the worm-like materials in a bowl.
“That white, fibrous stuff just isn’t normal, Hirschman told Dr. Ruby. “Typically a blood clot is smooth—it’s blood that’s coagulated—but if you squeeze it, or touch it, or try to pick it up, it generally falls apart,” he explained. “But this white, fibrous stuff is pretty strong. It’s not weak at all. You can manipulate it, it’s very pliable, it’s not hard—it is not normal,” the embalmer insisted. “I don’t know how anybody can live with this inside him.”
Hirschman said he’s seen the abnormal blood clots mostly in older people, but pointed out that younger people tend to be cremated these days, so he doesn’t see those cases.
He also noted that he has only seen the strange clots in one unvaccinated case—in a person who had received a blood transfusion—the implications of which are terrifying.
Well, YEAH. This is genocide. I don't mean to be rude, but this has been clear for at least 2 years, if you're reading the right things. Read my latest post if you want a quick Get Up to Speed.
And the cartoon with Bill Gates? The slide rule is completely out of context... He's no effing genius, he STOLE everything he owned, he didn't INVENT a damn thing. His family is eugenicist going back generations, and both his parents have ties to the Nazis from WWII.
On adverse effects - both these papers state numbers of people with reactions. They say that the numbers were in line with the trials (data for which was not being made readily available).
Feb 22 study from the Netherlands
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X22000287?via%3Dihub
COVID-19 vaccine reactogenicity – A cohort event monitoring study in the Netherlands using patient reported outcomes
Summary
22,184 participants. Of these, 13,959 (62.9%) experienced reactogenicity in general and 11,979 (54.0%) systemic reactogenicity within 7 days after vaccination.
And this from the JAMA April 2021 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2778441
Reactogenicity Following Receipt of mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccines
Summary
Self-reported Local and Systemic Reactions
Among V-safe Participants ( V safe seems to have been used instead of VAERS, could this have contributed to some of the significant undercounting in VAERS)
By February 21, 2021, more than 46 million persons received at least
1 dose of an mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine.8 A total of 3 643 918
persons were enrolled in v-safe and completed at least 1 health survey within 7 days following their first vaccine dose;
1 920 872 v-safe participants reported receiving a second vaccine dose and completed at least 1 daily health survey within 7 days following the second dose.
Solicited local and systemic reactions during days 0 to 7 after each dose were assessed.
Most v-safe participants reported an injection site reaction
(dose 1: 70.0%; dose 2: 75.2%)
or a systemic reaction (dose 1:50.0%; dose 2: 69.4%) during days 0 to 7 after vaccination (Table).
The most frequently reported solicited local and systemic reactions after the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine were injection site pain (67.8%), fatigue (30.9%), headache (25.9%), and myalgia (19.4%).
Reactogenicity was substantially greater after the second dose for
both vaccines, particularly for systemic reactions, including fatigue
(53.9%), headache (46.7%), myalgia (44.0%), chills (31.3%), fever
(29.5%), and joint pain (25.6%).
Yet the BMJ have a recent editorial referencing the SIREN study "the authors conclude that infection rates in patient facing healthcare workers would have been 69% higher without vaccination". Thank goodness for the speedy roll out of injections.
Maybe the powers that be think that we will all be so confused by the mixed messages that we will just decide to move on? I am not moving on anytime soon !