I APOLOGIZE

I was wrong

I need to correct my earlier post based on using the new more advanced Grok 2 AI answering my question about CO2 pollution; in reference to the big NetZero push by the WEF and eugenics Bill to stop using oil, coal ,and gas. I thought we were being duped. Now I think we are not only being duped….but I know we are being screwed and duped.

ASKING Grok 2…..if we cut the power consumption of all electric power plants in the World by 50% how much would it reduce the amount of CO2 mankind was putting into the atmosphere….I said earlier 7.5 ppm/ year .  I apologize…..Grok 2 corrects me and says it will only be 1.25 ppm / year.

Earlier Post:

Let’s Analyze the dastardly CO2 atmospheric carbon pollution

Grok**…..how does the total 415 ppm in the atmosphere break down. What percentage is used for energy production and what for all other human activities.

All Human activity is responsible for a total 20 ppm of the 415 ppm of CO2 in the atmosphere. …about 5 ppm from human activity and 15 ppm from burning gas, oil, and coal to keep the lights on.

Forget the fact for now that CO2 is not even a global warming carbon pollutant to start, and let’s assume the Con Men are right.

https://open.substack.com/pub/theagingviking/p/talk-about-a-scam?r=bm3n6&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

UPDATE

Full new answer by Grok 2***

***Estimating the exact reduction in atmospheric CO2 levels due to a 50% decrease in human power consumption involves several assumptions and considerations due to the complexity of the carbon cycle. Here's a simplified approach based on available information:

1. **Current Contribution**: Human activities contribute significantly to the annual increase in CO2 levels, but not all of the 415 ppm is due to recent human activity; much of it is a result of cumulative emissions over centuries.

2. **Annual Increase**: From the information provided, CO2 levels have been increasing by about 2 to 3 ppm per year recently due to human activities, including power consumption.

3. **Reduction in Emissions**: If we assume that power consumption from fossil fuels accounts for a substantial portion of these emissions, a 50% reduction in power consumption could theoretically cut a significant part of the annual increase. However, not all power consumption is from CO2-emitting sources, and not all CO2 emissions are from power consumption.

4. **Direct Impact Calculation**:

   - If we simplistically assume that half of the annual increase (let's take an average of 2.5 ppm/year) is directly due to power consumption, then reducing this by 50% might reduce the annual increase by about 1.25 ppm/year.

5. **Long-term Effects**:

   - **Immediate Effect**: There would be an immediate reduction in the rate at which CO2 ppm is increasing. Instead of rising by 2.5 ppm, it might rise by 1.25 ppm less per year, assuming other factors remain constant.

   - **Equilibrium and Sinks**: Over time, natural carbon sinks like oceans and forests continue to absorb CO2. If human emissions drop, these sinks would slowly start reducing the atmospheric concentration, but this process is slow.

   - **Long-term Reduction**: If this reduced emission were sustained, we might start seeing a stabilization or a very slow decrease in ppm over decades, not immediately due to the long residence time of CO2. However, predicting an exact ppm reduction over a specific timeframe like a year or even a decade is challenging due to:

     - **Carbon Cycle Dynamics**: The Earth's carbon cycle might absorb some of this excess CO2, but how much and how fast is influenced by many factors, including ocean chemistry, forest growth, permafrost melting, etc.

     - **Feedback Loops**: There might be unforeseen feedback where reduced CO2 leads to less warming, which might slow the release of CO2 from natural sources or enhance natural sinks.

Given these points, if we're looking for a direct annual reduction in ppm from a 50% cut in power consumption:

- **Short Term**: You might not see a reduction in the existing 415 ppm immediately but rather a decrease in the rate of increase. If we very roughly estimate, this could mean preventing an increase of up to 1.25 ppm per year, but this does not directly lower the 415 ppm.

Mankind produced CO2 will cause our planet to burn up. Just give us all of your money and we will fix it……..Lie lie, lie, lie, lie, lie lie……

Never stop distortions, propaganda and lies from our so called scientists, industry, and media. WHY are they lying…follow the money. Why would they lie you ask?……they want the power to eliminate 8 billion. You are the carbon pollution, not our consumption.

Please forward I am being filtered and blocked on X. You will notice my post get a couple of dozen hits on X when others are getting thousands of hits. The influence the WEF has on even X logarithms is become obvious. I have asked Elon to intervene to no avail. This post will be blocked and filtered.